Although no evidence has been found of widespread fraud, errors such as swapped names and inaccurate tabulations have resulted in allegations, petitions and formal protests. Over 200,000 citizens have signed a petition for a recount, and dozens of formal complaints have been handed to the Supreme Court. It is not just about errors, but whether the country's institutions can keep the public's trust in an atmosphere of growing distrust.

Pimples in A Polarized World
The official result came after a relatively smooth election that saw more than 21 million votes cast in more than 32,000 polling stations. Most vote tallies were correct, and more than 260,000 volunteers provided oversight. But serious errors were reported at some polling stations — such as one in Krakow. In Krakow results were first reversed, which resulted in a slanted lead by Nawrocki. When party observers stepped in, the accurate information had Trzaskowski carrying the precinct.

The same problems in other locations, such as Mińsk Mazowiecki, were also rectified after being uncovered. Although these errors affected just a handful of precincts in terms of raw total (fewer than 0.05 percent of all precincts), many of the errors occurred to the benefit of Trzaskowski, worsening the charges.

Political Tensions Legal Process in Progress
Under Poland's election laws, any citizen may file a formal protest within 14 days of the result. It is on the basis of such complaints that the Supreme Court's Special Chamber must make decisions. The chamber, however, is controversial because changes to the courts by the previous government have raised questions about its independence.

The task before the court necessitates that it determine whether there was a violation of the law, and if that violation may have materially affected the outcome. It's only at that point that a recount or re-election can take place. The existing deadline for complaints is June 16, with a final decision likely two weeks later.

As the continued review has intensified, social media and political voices have turned up the heat. Trzaskowski's supporters unhappy with the election have called it "stolen," but conservative leaders have rejected allegations of fraud as unfounded. Prime Minister Donald Tusk called for a full investigation, but warned against assuming guilty intention without evidence.

A Tipping Point for Polish Democracy
Now, Poland's democratic institutions are facing a serious stress test — not because the voting was rigged but because of how society and its leaders react to imperfections in the system. In the current politically fraught environment every misstep is in danger of being turned into political ammunition.

The institutions charged with overseeing the election have not effectively shut down, but the stress is on. The answer is whether faith in democracy can be maintained — ie, is transparency, accountability and restraint stronger than rumour and suspicion.